1998
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiJ5mwl-ZmlFh7QfSeijaKKD3QWDfASMZ3qgfchIU2Hosbjf776GbAd2p-MUh0XIaxI5cZeZiSU5W7D1L15R7Lg08cbBcUeWyPdKPXnAExZ0WVIJx6_aA7jIArCDjKrDzQ1ienaumxJQOl5/s320/001-binve_01.png)
present
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjNnNjiou8ROo7792ku5AOV7XVyWJ7dvA9GZGNf3lzhSspLuqKucsbyYZLVJh42lF2IavJlKJ8BxvZM_2tNvE3OOee92YzV24KphBFIGURNYFLzgsuOmjwTsA0dqIm-uNPWz0mHJE78h_zS/s320/001-binve_02.png)
So we are at a very interesting confirmation point right now. A break up of the small range at the top of the large range will be a very strong support of the comparison thesis.
Now I am sure that I will get a bunch of comments talking about my 'bias'/'loss of objectivity' like I had in this post: Revisiting the Large Count. But if you read this post in its entirety, you will understand where I am coming from.
I have pointed out a number of evidences in the past several months as to why the May top is likely not 'the' top. Yet am I not being permabullish. I am simply in no hurry to call the end of this cyclical bull market complete. And with all of the bearishness out there, my contrarian spidey-sense makes it seem like this whole mini-panic in Aug/Oct is a correction to be bought in the bigger scheme of things.