I analyze macroeconomic issues from a fundamental perspective, and I analyze market behavior from a technical perspective. Original macroeconomic analysis can be found here and both macro analysis and commentary can be found on my Caps blog. If you like or appreciate my analysis, please add yourself to my Following List
Showing posts with label Forex. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Forex. Show all posts

Monday, May 17, 2010

Bigger Fish to Fry, and update to Moving Some Macroeconomic Deck Chairs: The Dollar, Dollar Swaps, Bonds and LIBOR

This is an update to the original post that I wrote in the beginning of April: Moving Some Macroeconomic Deck Chairs: The Dollar, Dollar Swaps, Bonds and LIBOR

I am going to stick with my intro from last time because it sets the stage:

I am bearish on the US Dollar Long Term. This is no secret and I have been an outspoken critic of US monetary policy for a long time. Will we get a continued rally in the Dollar for the short term (next few months)? Yes, I think that is likely. But even a few months is short term in the bigger environment.

Here is an in-depth macro analysis of the Dollar that I wrote months ago: Thoughts on the US Dollar, Analysis of the USDX Long Term, Follow up on the Gold Blog. Aside from the fundamentals, I think the technicals also paint a bleak long term picture for the Dollar:


And we are getting the continued rally in the dollar like I was saying a month and a half ago. I am a long term dollar bear, but I am certainly not short it at the moment.

But you ask:

"What about deflation"
"What about inflation"
"What about hyper-inflation", etc.

If anybody is subscribing to an "either/or" philosophy here with regard to the monetary outcome, they don't know what they are talking about. It will be a combination.

There is NEVER anything in economics and especially macroeconomics that has only one cause and one effect. There are always multiple effects with varying degrees of influence (both in absolute value and transience). There will be deflationary impulses and there will be extreme monetary inflation, the Fed will see to that. Which means that I think the most likely outcome will be a combination of the two: stagflation. Economically correlated assets go down in value (like your home and equities as a general asset class) and things you need to buy/consume (such as real assets / commodities) cost more. Really the worst of all possible outcomes. But before I start veering way off topic, I lay out the case for a simultaneous deflationary and inflationary (stagflation) outcome here: Debt Saturation - http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=357428

In addition, see the link at the top of the page for a dollar / equity correlation chart that disproves the blanket statement that "inflation / a weak dollar helps stocks go up".

Dollar Swaps

I spent a lot of time in my last post discussing Dollar Swaps and the role that they play in the deleveraging crisis of 2008-2009. Here was what I wrote last time:

But we also have a very steep drop in LIBOR during the deleveraging crisis. Why is that? If everybody, most especially financials are scared, because there is a deleveraging and liquidity crisis, why would LIBOR go down?

Because the Fed was pumping the system with Dollar Swaps!!

**If you want the real reason for the "bottom" in March 2009, there it is.**

All arguments for compelling valuations are BS, or "once in a lifetime buying opportunities" are BS. We stopped the freefall NOT because the market said "no mas", but because the Fed stuck an inflatable pool halfway underneath the cliff divers trajectory. It forced liquidity into the system as it was seizing up. If you really want to understand this issue, read Kristjan Velbri's excellent post Dollar Liquidity Swaps & The Financial Crisis.


And in the context of Bigger Fish, the Fed after sucking up all of the open Dollar Swaps from the last crisis just rolled out a fresh batch of brand spanking new Dollar Swaps: http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20100509a.htm

n response to the reemergence of strains in U.S. dollar short-term funding markets in Europe, the Bank of Canada, the Bank of England, the European Central Bank, the Federal Reserve, and the Swiss National Bank are announcing the reestablishment of temporary U.S. dollar liquidity swap facilities. These facilities are designed to help improve liquidity conditions in U.S. dollar funding markets and to prevent the spread of strains to other markets and financial centers. The Bank of Japan will be considering similar measures soon. Central banks will continue to work together closely as needed to address pressures in funding markets.

Basically the idea behind the Fed is to head the next crisis off at the pass. The last crisis was a deleveraging and liquidity crisis. And the Fed wants to make sure that the crisis in Europe does not get amplified by a lack of liquidity in the reserve currency. And I am not faulting the Fed for this move. It makes a lot of sense. In fact, if I were in charge of the Fed I would fire myself... errr, I mean I would probably do the same thing.

But before everybody gets all ga-ga bullish about guaranteed liquidity, lets consider the context. The Fed stuck an inflatable pool halfway underneath the cliff divers trajectory when it forced liquidity into the system as it was seizing up during the last go around. That was a reactive move that prompted to the market to bounce off its oversold conditions. This is a proactive move, that while can be addressed as an act of prudence, speaks more like an act of desperation. The Fed is trying to stave off debt contagion. And since this crisis is sparked by sovereign debt worries and the the US debt sustainability issue resembles Greece more than it does Germany, the Fed and the Treasury have a very real reason to be afraid.

While this development is not immediately bearish, it is certainly in no way bullish.

LIBOR

Here is the LIBOR / Dollar picture from my April 6 post. Read the notes carefully:



And what does the picture look like today? Something very bearish. LIBOR is rising and accelerating. Fear is coming back en vogue. Contagion is the new 9-letter 4-letter word (...?!?!). A lot of people are saying "debt issues are overblown, buy the dip on the Euro". ... I am not so sure about that. Please see this EUR/USD analysis and projection that I put together back in March: Thoughts on the Euro, the Dollar, and a Long Term EUR/USD Count. The current EUR/USD is 1.23 which is about halfway down to my target from that post. So LIBOR, TED, the Dollar, Dollar Swaps, etc. are all saying it is time to be very cautious.

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Thoughts on the Euro, the Dollar, and a Long Term EUR/USD Count

Protechtor has a very nice long term EUR/USD count here: EUR/USD Longer Term View going back to 2007/2008. It prompted me to go back and review my long term EUR/USD count.

It is not secret that I am bearish on the US Dollar, both fundamentally and technically. For my fundamental picture, see here: Thoughts on the US Dollar, Analysis of the USDX Long Term, Follow up on the Gold Blog and actually I wrote a post on my other blog today that discussed this topic in more detail (inflationary policies by the Fed, debt saturation, why stocks will fall in an inflationary environment / stagflation): Debt Saturation

And there is another big reason why I am bearish on the Dollar long term: the EUR/USD count.

Now don't get me wrong. I am not Euro bull at all (being bearish the Dollar does not make me a de facto Euro bull. There are much better currencies out there). But there is a very interesting long term fundamental stack up between the Euro and the Dollar:

The Federal Reserve Note (the US Dollar)

-- The Dollar is governed by the Fed who is headed by politicians posing as economists and will *always* turn to the politically expedient action of debt monetization. Despite any rhetoric to the contrary, these are the Fed's actions. Until this is proof to the contrary, this should be the assumed going forward position.
-- "But the monetizing cannot keep up with the rate that debt is collapsing and therefore we will have deflation" ... I don't buy this for a second. QE-I was the opening salvo, and if you don't think there will be a QE-II then I think you will be surprised.
-- Essentially the US Dollar will be treated by our policymakers as economic toilet paper, who are not inflation hawks and will continue to perpetuate the myth that monetary inflation = price inflation and if we don't experience price inflation then monetary inflation is "ok" (THIS IS **WRONG!!!**. Monetary Inflation is a cause and price inflation is an effect. And like any cause and effect in economics there is a lag. By the time price inflation is generally detectable, the rampant monetary inflation will have created vast amounts of damage. These cycles have occurred many times and will occur again)

The Euro

-- Right now the Eurozone is a mess of failing economies and unhealthy economic activity
-- But painting Europe with a broad brush is not only misleading, it is incorrect
-- Germany is not only by far the strongest economies in Europe, it is one of the strongest economies in the world. Germany is a saving society. The Mittelstand companies (small/medium firms, mostly family owned) is exactly the economic model that most of the western world should be following. High exports and a strong currency.
-- So let me lay out this for a scenario: The Euro continues to have problems based on the constituent parties that have economies in rough shape (Greece, Spain, Portugal, etc.). But Germany and Switzerland, and to a lesser extent France and Belgium are in much better shape. What if the Euro morphs into a "consolidated" Euro based on the currencies of the stronger economies
-- While still fraught with problems, I would still say on a relative basis the Euro has more future opportunity to become stronger than the US Dollar. Especially as the ECB is much more hawkish on inflation than the Fed.

Compounding the fact that in the world of Debt Saturation, economies and currencies that are based on real goods (such as the Canadian Dollar and the Australian Dollar) will outperform the US Dollar.

So, based on this argument, and the links at the beginning of the post, I am bearish on the US Dollar Index, and a number of Dollar currency pairs for the long term, and am more bullish on the Euro than the Dollar (not enough to *actually* be bullish, just as a relative measure) over the long term.

Here is the technical picture of the EUR/USD that backs up that story:



The move from 200-2008 looks like a very clear 5-wave move and we are in the middle of an ABC zigzag retrace.

The EUR/USD could do a double bottom for the C wave at ~1.20 (50% retrace), but I believe it will make a run for the support zone at 1.12 (62% retrace).

This means my long term forecast for the US Dollar is down (and no, that is *not* bullish for stocks over the long term as I explain here, as the stock market and the Dollar will resume their long term stance, which is positive correlation)

Friday, December 11, 2009

EUR/USD Update

Dollar is still rallying.

Sneaky EUR/USD

Something more complicated is going on. This is what I think at the moment

Thursday, December 10, 2009

EUR/USD, USD/CHF, USD/JPY ....

... all looking like they are suggesting a Dollar pullback, probably for the next several days / couple of weeks (depending on the sharpness of the reaction)



Wednesday, December 9, 2009

EUR/USD Breakout?

As I was saying earlier today in EUR/USD Possible Reversal, it looks like we have an ending diagonal with a possible breakout.

Well, it looks to me like the breakout is occurring. The DX is down to 75.86 at the moment, down from 76.37 on Tuesday.


EUR/USD Possible Reversal

The EUR/USD is sporting a possible ending diagonal. USD/CHF is sporting a similar inverse pattern. Both would suggest that the dollar rally will be taking a slight breather soon.

(trying out a different template)